Home Failure Case Library Poor Reproducibility Between Duplicate Wells
ELISA (Sigma Guide) severe

Poor Reproducibility Between Duplicate Wells

Symptom
Coefficient of variation (CV) between duplicate or triplicate wells exceeds 10-15%. Individual replicates show inconsistent absorbance values that cannot be attributed to biological variation.
Common Causes
  1. 1 Uneven plate coating with inconsistent antibody or antigen coverage across wells
  2. 2 Insufficient or non-uniform washing with obstructions in washing ports
  3. 3 Variation in incubation temperature across plate positions
  4. 4 Inconsistent coating and blocking volumes between wells
Solutions
  1. 1 Use proper high-binding ELISA plates; verify coating and blocking volumes are consistent (typically 100 µL per well)
  2. 2 Follow uniform washing procedures; inspect and clear any obstructions in washer aspiration or dispensing ports; validate wash cycles
  3. 3 Use temperature-controlled incubator; avoid placement near heat sources or air vents; allow plates to equilibrate to room temperature before reading
  4. 4 Use calibrated multichannel pipettes; dispense from reagent reservoirs; verify pipette accuracy and precision
Related Video (3)
Thermo Fisher Scientific ★ 92
How to coat your own plate and run an Invitrogen ELISA kit
"Explicitly demonstrates plate coating technique, which is the root cause of poor well-to-well reproducibility in this failure case"
Bilibili (China-Accessible Mirrors) ★ 78
DuoSet ELISA — Sandwich ELISA Hands-on Protocol (Bio-Techne)
"Hands-on DuoSet sandwich ELISA protocol that emphasizes plate coating as a critical first step, directly addressing uneven antibody/antigen coverage"
Bilibili (China-Accessible Mirrors) ★ 72
How to Run an R&D Systems Quantikine ELISA
"Complete R&D Systems Quantikine workflow with troubleshooting guidance applicable to identifying and correcting well-coating inconsistencies"
Source: sigmaaldrich.com ↗
← Back to all cases