Home › Molecular Biology › qPCR Principles, Experimental Workflow and Results Analysis
Molecular Biology Bilibili (China-Accessible Mirrors)

qPCR Principles, Experimental Workflow and Results Analysis

🚨 Failure Case Library (16) + Submit your own case

critical
No amplification — Ct value missing or > 40
Amplification plot is flat for both target and reference; software reports "no Ct" or Ct > 40 even for positive controls.
💡 5 · ✓ 5
critical
High Signal in All Samples Including No Template Control
PCR amplification occurs in all samples including no template controls (NTC), producing Ct values or visible bands in negative controls. This indicates systemic contamination rather than specific ChIP enrichment.
💡 4 · ✓ 5
critical
False Positive PCR Results from DNA Contamination
No-template controls (NTC) or negative controls show unexpected amplification. Particularly problematic in sensitive applications like human identification qPCR where trace DNA contamination produces false positives.
💡 3 · ✓ 3
severe
Low Fluorescence Due to Inadequate Probe Labeling or Quenching
Low or absent fluorescence in both test sample and positive control; correct PCR product is visible on gel; one probe in multiplex shows consistently high background with no amplification signal; background fluorescence equivalent to water control
💡 5 · ✓ 6
severe
Poor Ct reproducibility — high within-group variability
Technical replicates of the same sample have SD > 0.5 cycles; standard curve linearity is poor; loading order influences results.
💡 5 · ✓ 5
severe
Reference gene is unstable — normalization fails
Reference gene Ct varies > 1 cycle between samples; trend of reference vs target gene disagrees; normalization gives strange results.
💡 4 · ✓ 4
severe
No or Low PCR Amplification Due to Plastic Consumable Issues
PCR reaction fails to produce expected amplification or yields significantly reduced product, despite optimized reagents and cycling parameters. The issue traces to suboptimal thermal transfer or contamination from the plastic vessel itself.
💡 4 · ✓ 4
severe
Plate or Tube Melting and Adhering to Block
After PCR program completion, plates or tubes are found melted or stuck to the thermal cycler block, making removal difficult and potentially damaging samples. Plastic shows signs of thermal degradation.
💡 3 · ✓ 3
severe
PCR Sample Evaporation and Loss During Cycling
Visible reduction in reaction volume after thermal cycling, with condensation on tube caps or film. May result in concentrated reagents, failed reactions, or inability to recover product.
💡 3 · ✓ 3
severe
PCR Efficiency Greater Than 120% with Inconsistent ΔCq
PCR efficiency calculated from standard curve is greater than 120%; ΔCq between 10-fold dilutions is much less than expected 3.3 cycles (e.g., 1.5 cycles); standard curve gradient indicates abnormally high efficiency
💡 4 · ✓ 6
moderate
Variable qPCR Data Across Wells
Quantitative PCR shows inconsistent Cq values or fluorescence intensities between technical replicates in different wells, despite identical reaction setup. Well-to-well variability exceeds acceptable coefficient of variation.
💡 2 · ✓ 2
moderate
PCR Tube Crushing or Deformation Under Lid Pressure
PCR tubes become crushed, collapsed, or deformed after thermal cycling, potentially causing sample loss or compromised seal integrity. Tubes may show visible damage especially when using tube strips.
💡 3 · ✓ 3
moderate
PCR Tube Caps Popping Off During Cycling
Individual tube caps become dislodged during thermal cycling, exposing samples to evaporation and potential contamination. Caps are found loose or completely separated from tubes after run completion.
💡 3 · ✓ 3
moderate
Amplification Plots Dip Below Zero Due to Incorrect Baseline Settings
Amplification plots are clearly abnormal with sections dipping below zero dR; data cannot be used as presented; plots appear distorted
💡 3 · ✓ 4
moderate
Low qPCR Fluorescence Signal from Optical Issues
Quantitative PCR shows weak fluorescence signal across all wells, making accurate quantification difficult. Signal intensity is lower than expected despite adequate template and reagent quality.
💡 2 · ✓ 2
moderate
Irregular Standard Curve Spacing Due to Sample Inhibitors
Cq data for standard curve dilutions are irregularly spaced; ΔCq between dilutions is inconsistent and decreases with increasing dilutions; replicates are precise but pattern is abnormal
💡 3 · ✓ 5
💬 Comments coming soon