Home › Biochemistry › R&D Systems Quantikine ELISA Operation Guide
Biochemistry Bilibili (China-Accessible Mirrors)

R&D Systems Quantikine ELISA Operation Guide

🚨 Failure Case Library (30) + Submit your own case

critical
Absent Standard Curve Signal with Normal Zero Standard
No detectable signal is observed for standard curve points containing analyte, while the zero standard (maximum binding control) shows normal OD values, indicating complete loss of competitive inhibition.
💡 4 · ✓ 4
critical
No Signal or Weak Signal in ELISA
After developing the ELISA plate, wells show no color change or very faint signal that is barely above background, even for positive controls or high-concentration standards.
💡 6 · ✓ 6
critical
No Signal or Weak Signal in ELISA
No detectable signal or very weak signal across all wells, including standard wells. The plate reader shows absorbance values near baseline or significantly lower than expected.
💡 6 · ✓ 6
critical
No Signal for Standard Curve with Normal Zero Standard
All standard concentrations show no signal (high OD in competitive format similar to zero standard), while the zero standard (no competitor) shows normal maximum binding signal.
💡 4 · ✓ 4
critical
Complete Absence of Standard Curve Signal with Normal Zero
All standard concentrations show no detectable signal (very low OD), while the zero standard (B0, maximum binding) produces normal expected signal, indicating complete competition failure.
💡 4 · ✓ 4
severe
Excessive Non-Specific Background Signal in Competitive ELISA
High background optical density readings are observed across wells, obscuring the difference between standards and samples. Signal persists even in wells without primary antibody or sample.
💡 4 · ✓ 4
severe
B/B0 Ratio Outside Acceptable Range at Curve Endpoints
The B/B0 ratio (bound/maximum bound) for the terminal point of the standard curve is either >95% or <5%, indicating insufficient competitive displacement range.
💡 3 · ✓ 3
severe
Insufficient Signal from Zero Standard (B0)
The zero standard (no competing antigen, maximum antibody binding) produces OD values that are too low, resulting in compressed standard curve with poor sensitivity.
💡 4 · ✓ 4
severe
Standard Curve Plateau at High Concentration Range
The standard curve reaches a plateau (flat response) at high standard concentrations with correspondingly low OD values, failing to show expected dose-response relationship in competitive ELISA format.
💡 4 · ✓ 4
severe
Non-specific Background Signal Too High in Competitive ELISA
High background optical density is observed across wells, reducing signal-to-noise ratio and making it difficult to distinguish specific binding from non-specific interactions.
💡 4 · ✓ 4
severe
Standard Curve Plateau at High Concentration End
The standard curve reaches a plateau at high analyte concentrations (low OD values in competitive format), showing no further decrease in signal despite increasing standard concentration.
💡 4 · ✓ 4
severe
Detection System Lacks Sensitivity for Target Concentration
Low or no signal despite proper assay setup. High concentration samples may show weak signal while low concentration samples are undetectable.
💡 4 · ✓ 4
severe
Buffer Components Inhibit Detection Enzyme
No or very weak signal despite correct antibody binding. Signal loss occurs after addition of detection reagent. Other wells using different buffers show normal signal.
💡 4 · ✓ 4
severe
High Inter-Assay CV from Inconsistent Sample Storage
High inter-assay coefficient of variation (>15%) when the same samples are tested across different runs. Sample readings decrease over time or vary unpredictably between runs.
💡 5 · ✓ 5
severe
Incomplete Standard Reconstitution with Visible Particulates
After adding reconstitution buffer to lyophilized standard, visible undissolved material or particulates remain in the vial, leading to inaccurate standard concentrations.
💡 4 · ✓ 6
severe
Low OD Value for Zero Standard in Competitive ELISA
The zero standard (B0, representing maximum antibody binding without competing analyte) produces lower than expected optical density values, reducing overall assay sensitivity and dynamic range.
💡 4 · ✓ 4
severe
High Variability Between Replicates (CV >15%)
Replicate wells for the same sample or standard show high coefficient of variation (>15%), with inconsistent absorbance values that suggest uneven treatment or technical errors.
💡 5 · ✓ 5
severe
Uneven Color Development Across Plate
Color intensity varies significantly between wells that should be identical. Pattern may show edge effects, gradients across the plate, or random spotty appearance indicating incomplete or inconsistent reagent contact.
💡 4 · ✓ 4
severe
High Uniform Background Signal
All wells show elevated absorbance including blanks and negative controls, creating a uniformly high background that reduces signal-to-noise ratio and compresses the standard curve.
💡 5 · ✓ 5
moderate
Incubation Temperature Below Optimal Range
Consistently weak signal across all samples including positive controls. Signal improves when experiment is repeated with attention to temperature. Longer incubations partially compensate.
💡 4 · ✓ 4
moderate
Over-Washing Removes Bound Detection Reagents
Signal progressively decreases with increased wash steps or aggressive washing. Reducing wash stringency restores signal. Edge wells show lower signal than center wells.
💡 4 · ✓ 5
moderate
Excessive Signal Amplification in Detection System
Very high signals across all wells including low-concentration standards. Loss of discrimination between different antigen concentrations. Background approaches signal levels.
💡 4 · ✓ 4
moderate
High CV from Bubbles in Wells
Inconsistent absorbance readings between replicate wells with coefficient of variation >15%. Visual inspection may reveal bubbles present in wells, particularly when using detergent-containing solutions.
💡 4 · ✓ 4
moderate
Unexpected or Inconsistent Assay Results
Sample quantification values are outside expected biological range, controls fail to meet acceptance criteria, or results are not reproducible between runs despite similar experimental conditions.
💡 5 · ✓ 5
moderate
Biological Sample Not in Detectable Range
Standard curve appears normal, but sample wells show no signal or signal below the lowest standard. This occurs when the analyte concentration in samples is below the assay detection limit.
💡 4 · ✓ 4
moderate
High Variability Between Experimental Runs
Standard curves or sample values differ significantly between experiments run on different days, despite using the same reagents and protocol, showing poor reproducibility.
💡 5 · ✓ 5
moderate
B/B0 Ratio at Standard Curve Endpoint Out of Range
The B/B0 ratio (bound/maximum bound) at the lowest or highest standard concentration is either >95% or <5%, indicating the standard curve dynamic range is not properly positioned.
💡 3 · ✓ 3
moderate
High Coefficient of Variation Between Standard Replicates
Duplicate or triplicate wells for the same standard concentration show high variability (CV >10-15%), compromising curve fit and confidence in quantification.
💡 5 · ✓ 6
minor
Sample Values Above Assay Range (Hook Effect Excluded)
Sample absorbance readings exceed the top standard, reading off the curve, while the standard curve itself appears normal with proper shape and dynamic range.
💡 2 · ✓ 3
minor
Green Color Upon Adding Stop Solution (Streptavidin-HRP)
When sulfuric acid stop solution is added to wells after TMB substrate incubation, a green color appears instead of the expected yellow, indicating incomplete mixing and pH gradient in the well.
💡 2 · ✓ 3
💬 Comments coming soon